Open Access
Ciência Téc. Vitiv.
Volume 31, Number 2, 2016
Page(s) 88 - 97
Published online 13 January 2017
  • Albiac J., Albisu L.M., Alejandre J.L., 1986. Actitud de los consumidores respecto al vino. MAPA: Serie Economía, 31. [Google Scholar]
  • Bernabéu R., Brugarolas M., Martínez-Carrasco L., Díaz M., 2008. Wine origin and organic elaboration, differentiating strategies in traditional producing countries. Brit. Food J., 110 (2), 174–188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bernabéu R., Olmeda M., Díaz M., 2005. Estructura de preferencias de los consumidores de vino y actitudes hacia los vinos con Denominación de Origen. El caso de Castilla-La Mancha. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales, 5, 57–80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bernabéu R., Prieto A., Díaz M., 2013. Preference patterns for wine consumption in Spain depending on the degree of consumer ethnocentrism. Food Qual. Prefer., 28 (1), 77–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bernabéu R., Tendero A., Olmeda M., 2012. Consumer preferences versus commercial differentiation: A Spanish case study. Brit. Food J., 114 (11), 1626–1639. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Braña T., Ferraces M.J., Varela J., 1995. Diseño factorial incompleto. IV Simposium de Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento. Murcia (Spain). [Google Scholar]
  • Brugarolas M., Martínez-Poveda A., Martínez-Carrasco L., 2009. Aceptación de productos en los mercados locales: El aceite de oliva en la Comunidad Valenciana, VII Congreso Nacional de Economía Agraria. Almería (Spain). [Google Scholar]
  • Chasin J., Holzmuller H., Jaffe E., 1988. Stereotyping, buyer familiarity and ethnocentrism: a cross-cultural analysis. J. Int. Consum. Market., 1 (2), 9–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chryssochoidis G., Krystallis A., Perreas P., 2007. Ethnocentric beliefs and country-of-origin (COO) effect: Impact of country, product and product attributes on Greek consumers’ evaluation of food products. Eur. J. Marketing, 41 (11/12), 1518–1544. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Durvasula S., Andrews C., Netemeyer R., 1997. A cross-cultural comparison of consumer ethnocentrism in the United States and Russian. J. Int. Consum. Market., 9 (4), 73–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • George D., Mallery P., 2003. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 386 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Gil J.M., Sánchez M., 1997. Consumer preferences for wine attributes. A Conjoint approach. British Food Journal, 99 (1), 3–11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Green P.E., Rao V.R., 1971. Conjoint Measurement from Quantifying Judgemental Data. J. Marketing Res., 8, 355–363. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Black W.C., 1999. Análisis multivariante. Prentice-Hall. Madrid (Spain), 799 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Halbrendt C.K., Wirth E.F., Vaughn G.F., 1991. Conjoint analysis of the Mid-Atlantic food-fish market for farm-raised hybrid stripted bass. Southtern Journal of Agricultural Economics, July, 155–163. [Google Scholar]
  • Han C., 1988. The role of consumer patriotism in the choice of domestic versus foreign products. J. Advertising Res., June-July, 25–32. [Google Scholar]
  • Hung C., 1989. A country of origin product image study: The Canadian perception and nationality biases. J. Int. Consum. Market., 1, 5–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ikerfel-OeMv, 2012. Estudio entorno al consumo de vino en la población española: frenos al consumo y potenciales aceleradores del consumo de vino. Available at: (Accessed 29 Dec 2014). [Google Scholar]
  • Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses (INTCF), 2015. Memoria 2014. Available at: (Accessed 18 Dec 2016). [Google Scholar]
  • Johansson J.K., Douglas S.P., Nonaka I., 1985. Assessing the impact of country of origin on product evaluations: a new methodological perspective. J. Marketing Res., 22, 388–396. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Junta de Comunidades de Castile-La Mancha (JCCM), 2011. Estrategia regional del vino. Available at: (Accessed 23 Jan 2012). [Google Scholar]
  • Kavak B., Gumusluoglu L., 2007. Segmenting food markets: The role of ethnocentrism and lifestyle in understanding purchasing intentions. Int. J. Market Res., 49 (1), 71–94. [Google Scholar]
  • Kirk J., 1982. Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioural sciences. Brooks-Cole Co. 2nd ed. Monterrey, CA, 500 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Loureiro M.L., 2003. Rethinking new wines: implications of local and environmentally friendly labels. Food Policy, 28, 547–560. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Luque-Martínez T., Ibáñez-Zapata J.A., Del Barrio-García S., 2000. Consumer etnocentrism measurement An assessment of the reliability and validity of the CETSCALE in Spain. Eur. J. Marketing, 34 (11/12), 1353–1373. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marín S.C., 2005. El origen doméstico de los productos como ventaja competitiva: La etnocentricidad del consumidor. Universitat de Valencia. Valencia (Spain). [Google Scholar]
  • Martínez-Carrasco L., Brugarolas M., Del Campo F.J., Martínez A., 2006. Influence of purchase place and consumption frequency over quality wine preferences. Food Qual. Prefer., 17, 315–327. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente (MAGRAMA), (2012a). Panel de consumo alimentario. Available at: (Accessed 2 Mar 2012). [Google Scholar]
  • Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente (MAGRAMA), (2012b). Encuesta sobre superficies y rendimientos de cultivo (ESYRCE). Available at: (Accessed 19 Jan 2012). [Google Scholar]
  • Netemeyer R., Durvasula S., Lichtenstein D., 1991. A crossnational assessment of the reliability and validity of the CETSCALE. J. Marketing Res., 28, 320–327. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Parts O., 2007. The measurement of consumer ethnocentrism and COO effect in consumer research. Transform. Bus. Econ., 6 (1), 139–154. [Google Scholar]
  • Ribeiro A., Melo A.C., Vilhena R., 2002. Appellation of origin/geographical indication a strategy for the new vitivinicultural world. Paper presented at XXVII World Congress on Vine and Wine. Bratislava (Slovakia). [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma S., Shimp T., Shin J., 1995. Consumer Ethnocentrism: A test of antecedents and moderators. J. Acad. Market. Sci., 23 (1), 26–37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shimp T., Sharma S., 1987. Consumer Ethnocentrism: Construction and Validation of the CETSCALE. J. Marketing Res., 24, 280–289. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Skuras D., Vakrou A., 2002. Consumer’s willingness to pay for origin labelled wine: A Greek case study. Brit. Food J., 104 (11), 898–912. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • SPSS Inc., 2009. SPSS Categories. Version 15.0. Chicago [Google Scholar]
  • Steenkamp J.B., 1987. Conjoint measurement in ham quality evaluation. J. Agr. Econ., 38, 473–480. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Supphellen M., Gronhaug K., 2003. Building foreign brand personalities in Russia: the moderating effect of consumer ethnocentrism. Int. J. Advert., 22, 203–226. [Google Scholar]
  • Thode S.F., Maskulka J.M., 1998. Place-based marketing strategies, brand equity and vineyard valuation. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 7 (5), 379–399. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Verlegh P.W.J., Steenkamp J.B.E.M., 1999. A review and metaanalysis of country-of-origin research. J. Econ. Psychol., 20, 521–546. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wall P., Heslop L.A., 1986. Consumer attitudes toward Canadianmade versus imported product. J. Acad. Market. Sci., 8 (4), 345–356. [Google Scholar]
  • Welch S., Comer J.C., 1988. Quantitative methods for public administration: techniques and applications. Chicago: Dorsey Press, 362 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Wind Y., 1978. Issues and advances in segmentation research. J. Marketing Res., 15, 317–337. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Witkowsky T., 1998. Consumer ethnocentrism in two emergent markets: determinants and predictive validity. Adv. Consum. Res., 25, 258–263. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.