EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 40 / No 1 (2025) Ciência Téc. Vitiv., 40 1 (2025) 10-28 References
Open Access
Issue
Ciência Téc. Vitiv.
Volume 40, Number 1, 2025
Page(s) 10 - 28
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/ctv2025400110
Published online 13 March 2025
  • ALABE, 2024. Instruções/informações SENSORIAL-ALABE. Associação dos Laboratórios de Enologia,. Available at: https://www.alabe.pt/docs/sensorial/doc_instru%C3%A7%C3%B5es_sa2021_v10.pdf (accessed on 27.12.2024). [Google Scholar]
  • ASTM E1885-04, 2011. Standard Test Method for Sensory Analysis - Triangle Test. [Google Scholar]
  • AWRI (Australian Wine Research Institute), 2024. Wine flavours, faults and taints. Available at: https://www.awri.com.au/industry_support/winemaking_resources/sensory_assessment/recognition-of-wine-faults-and-taints/wine_faults/ (accessed on 30.08.2024). [Google Scholar]
  • Beeren C., 2018. Application of Descriptive Sensory Analysis to Food and Drink Products. In:Descriptive Analysis in Sensory Evaluation. 609–646. Kemp S.E., Hort J., Hollowood T. (eds.), Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Burdock G.A., 2016. Fenaroli's handbook of flavor ingredients. 2159 p. CRC Press, Boca Raton. [Google Scholar]
  • Civille G.V., Carr B.T., Osdoba K.E., 2024. Sensory Evaluation Techniques (6 ed.). 999 p. CRC Press. Boca Raton. [Google Scholar]
  • Curtis R.F., Land D.G., Griffiths N.M., Gee M., Robinson D., Peel J.L., Dennis C., Gee J.M., 1972. 2,3,4,6-Tetrachloroanisole Association with Musty Taint in Chickens and Microbiological Formation. Nature, 235, 223–224 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Diep T., Yoo M., Pook C., Sadooghy-Saraby S., Gite A., Rush E., 2021. Volatile Components and Preliminary Antibacterial Activity of Tamarillo (Solanum betaceum Cav.). Foods, 10, 2212. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Duizer L.M., Walker S.B., 2016. The Application of Sensory Science to the Evaluation of Grain-Based Foods. In : Encyclopedia of Food Grains (Second Edition). 144–153. Wrigley C., Corke H., Seetharaman K., Faubion J. (Eds.), Academic Press, New York. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • EA, 2022. Accreditation for sensory testing laboratories. In: European co-operation for Accreditation, Laboratory Committee. (EA-4/09 G: 2022). European Accreditation, Utrecht. [Google Scholar]
  • Filipello F., 1956. A Critical comparison of the two‐sample and triangular binomial designs. J. Food Sci., 21, 235–241. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ford R.A., 2017. Deciding Which Test to Use in Discrimination Testing. In: Discrimination Testing in Sensory Science: A Practical Handbook, 67–83. Rogers L. (Ed.) Woodhead Publishing. Sawston. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Frijters J.E.R., 1977. The effect of duration of intervals between olfactory stimuli in the triangular method. Chem. Senses, 2, 301–311. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Frijters J.E.R., Blauw Y.H., Vermaat S.H., 1982. Incidental training in the Triangular Method. Chem. Senses, 7, 63–69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gaby J. M., Bakke A.J., Baker A.N., Hopfer H., Hayes J.E., 2020. Individual Differences in Thresholds and Consumer Preferences for Rotundone Added to Red Wine. Nutrients, 12, 2522. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Grainger K., 2021. Wine Faults and Flaws: A Practical Guide. 528 p. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex. [Google Scholar]
  • Greim H., 2024. 2-Mercaptoethanol. In : Encyclopedia of Toxicology (4th edition). 111–115. Wexler P. (Ed.), Academic Press. Boca Raton. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Griffiths N.M., 1974. Sensory properties of the chloro-anisoles. Chem. Senses, 1, 187–195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hopkins J.W., 1954. Some Observations on Sensitivity and Repeatability of Triad Taste Difference Tests. Biometrics, 10, 521–530. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hyldig G., 2010. Proficiency testing of sensory panels. In : Sensory Analysis for Food and Beverage Quality Control. 37–48. Kilcast D. (Ed.), Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • IPAC., 2019. DRC005 - Procedimento para Acreditação de Laboratórios. Available at: http://www.ipac.pt/docs/publicdocs/regulamentos/DRC005_ProcAcrLabs_v20191106.pdf (accessed on 23.08.2024). [Google Scholar]
  • ISO 3591, 1977. Sensory analysis- Apparatus-Wine-tasting glass. International Organization of Standardization. Genève. Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  • ISO/IEC 17025, 2017. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. International Organization of Standardization. Genève. Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  • ISO 4120, 2021 - Sensory analysis — Methodology — Triangle test. International Organization of Standardization. Genève. [Google Scholar]
  • ISO/IEC 17043, 2023. Conformity assessment-General requirements for the competence of proficiency testing providers. International Organization of Standardization. Genève. Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  • Kemp, D. S. E., Hollowood, D. T., Hort, D. J., 2009. Sensory Test Methods. In : Sensory Evaluation - A practical handbook. 66–137. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kemp S.E., Hollowood T., Hort J., Rogers L. 2024. Introduction. In : Discrimination Testing in Sensory Evaluation. 1–24. Wiley. West Sussex. [Google Scholar]
  • Kilcast D., 2010. Sensory Analysis for Food and Beverage Quality Control: A Practical Guide. 400 p. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  • Kunert J., Meyners M., 1999. On the triangle test with replications. Food Qual. Prefer., 10, 477–482. [Google Scholar]
  • Lawless H.T., Heymann H., 2010. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices (2 ed.). 596 p. Springer Verlag. New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Mitterer-Daltoé M.L, De Oliveira Treptow R., Martins E., Martins V.M.V., Queiroz M. I., 2012. Selecting and Training a Panel to Evaluate the Metallic Sensation of Meat. Food Sci Technol Res., 18(2), 279–286. [Google Scholar]
  • Malleret L., Bruchet A., Hennion M.C., 2001. Picogram Determination of “Earthy-Musty” Odorous Compounds in Water Using Modified Closed Loop Stripping Analysis and Large Volume Injection GC/MS. Anal. Chem., 73, 1485–1490. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McEwan J.A., Heiniö R.L., Hunter E.A., Lea P., 2003. Proficiency testing for sensory ranking panels: measuring panel performance. Food Qual. Prefer., 14, 247–256 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McKay M., Bauer F., Panzeri V., Buica A., 2018. Testing the Sensitivity of Potential Panelists for Wine Taint Compounds Using a Simplified Sensory Strategy. Foods, 7, 176. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Meilgaard M.C., Civille G.V., Carr B.T., 2015. Sensory Evaluation Techniques (5 ed.). 589 p. CRC Press, Boca Raton. [Google Scholar]
  • Meyners M., Carr B.T., 2024. Replicated Discrimination Testing. In: Discrimination Testing in Sensory Evaluation. 151–195. Rogers L., Hort J., Kemp S.E., Hollowood T. (eds). Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • O’Mahony M., 1986. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Statistical Methods and Procedures. 510 p. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York [Google Scholar]
  • O'Mahony M., 1995. Who told you the triangle test was simple? Food Qual. Prefer., 6, 227–238. [Google Scholar]
  • Ojeh S., 2020. Discrimination Test Methods. In: Sensory Testing Methods (3 ed). 25–49. West Conshohocken, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Palermo, J.-R., 2015. Análise sensorial: fundamentos e métodos (1 ed). 140 p. Atheneu, São Paulo. [Google Scholar]
  • Persson P.-E., 1980. Sensory properties and analysis of two muddy odour compounds, geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol, in water and fish. Water Res., 14, 1113–1118. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pinto M., Barros P., Vilela A., Correia E., 2024. Controlling sensory analysis results: tools and importance in assessor selection. Case study: PROVA-ALABE proficiency test. Ciência Téc. Vitiv, 39, 30–50. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Roessler E. B., Pangborn R., Sidel J. L., Stone H., 1978. Expanded statistical tables for estimating significance in paired-preference, paired difference, duo-trio and triangle tests. J. Food Sci., 43, 940–943. [Google Scholar]
  • Rogers L., 2017. Appendix 2 - Statistical Tables. In: Discrimination Testing in Sensory Science. 363–487. Rogers L. (Ed.), Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  • Schultz A., 2021. The Basis of Sensory Data for QC: Sensory Specifications. In: The Role of Sensory Analysis in Quality Control (2 ed). 47–54. West Conshohocken. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sinkinson C., 2017. Triangle Test. In : Discrimination Testing in Sensory Science. 153–170. Rogers L. (ed.), Woodhead Publishing. Sawston. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stone H., Bleibaum R.N., Thomas H.A., 2012. Sensory Evaluation Practices (4 ed.). 438 p. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego. [Google Scholar]
  • Yeretzian C., 2017. Coffee. In : Springer Handbook of Odor. 21–22. Buettner A. (Ed.), Springer International Publishing, New York. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.