Open Access
Issue
Ciência Téc. Vitiv.
Volume 39, Number 2, 2024
Page(s) 74 - 83
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/ctv2024390274
Published online 05 November 2024
  • Ayele A., Derseh A., 2021. Sustainability time and its determinant factors of small and medium-scale enterprises in East Gojjam Zone: parametric survival regression model. Glob. Bus. Rev., 25, 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  • Belém M.J.X., Vieira Junior M., Mummolo G., Facchini F., 2021. An AHP-based procedure for model selection for eco-efficiency assessment. Sustain., 13, 12121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Berre D., Vayssières J., Boussemart J.-P., Leleu H., Tillard E., Lecomte P., 2015. A methodology to explore the determinants of eco-efficiency by combining an agronomic whole-farm simulation model and efficient frontier. Environ. Modell. Softw., 71, 46–59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bonfiglio A., Arzeni A., Bodini A., 2017. Assessing eco-efficiency of arable farms in rural areas. Agric. Syst., 151, 114–125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Costa J.M., Vaz M., Escalona J., Egipto R., Lopes C., Medrano H., Chaves M.M., 2016. Modern viticulture in southern Europe: vulnerabilities and strategies for adaptation to water scarcity. Agric. Water Manag., 164, 5–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Czyżewski B., Matuszczak A., Muntean A., 2018. Influence of agricultural policy on the environmental sustainability of European farming. Env. Prot. Ecol., 19, 426–434. [Google Scholar]
  • Czyżewski B., Matuszczak A., Muntean A., 2019. Approaching environmental sustainability of agriculture: environmental burden, eco-efficiency or eco-effectiveness. Agric. Econ. – Czech, 65, 299–306. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Elkington J., 2018. 25 years ago I coined the phrase triple bottom line. Here’s why it’s time to rethink it. Harvard Business Review (Sustainability). Available at: https://hbr.org/2018/06/25-years-ago-icoined-the-phrase-triple-bottom-line-heres-why-m-giving-up-on-it (accessed on 20.04.2022). [Google Scholar]
  • Elkington J., 1994. Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif. Manag. Rev., 36, 90–100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Flores S.S., 2018. What is sustainability in the wine world? A cross-country analysis of wine sustainability frameworks. J. Clean. Prod., 172, 2301–2312. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • García-Cortijo M.C., Ferrer J.F., Castillo-Valero J.S., Pinilla V., Carrasco I., Serrano R., 2023. Sustainability hedonic environmental models applied to wineries. Ciência Téc. Vitiv., 38, 167–177. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Gerdessen J.C., Pascucci S., 2013. Data Envelopment Analysis of sustainability indicators of European agricultural systems at regional level. Agric. Syst., 118, 78–90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gomes E.G., 2008. Uso de modelos DEA em agricultura: revisão da literatura. Engevista, 10, 27–51. [Google Scholar]
  • González-Esquivel C.E., Camacho-Moreno E., Larrondo-Posadas L., Sum-Rojas C., León-Cifuentes W.E., Vital-Peralta E., Astier M., López-Ridaura S., 2020. Sustainability of agroecological interventions in small scale farming systems in the Western Highlands of Guatemala. Int. J. Agric. Sustain., 18, 285–299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Graça A.R., Simões L., Freitas R., Pessanha M., Sandeman G., 2017. Using sustainable development actions to promote he relevance of mountain wines in export markets. Open Agric., 2, 571–579. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Grzelak A., Guth M., Matuszczak A., Brelik A., 2019. Approaching the environmental sustainable value in agriculture: How factor endowments foster the eco-efficiency. J. Clean. Prod., 241, 118304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hayati D., 2017. A literature review on frameworks and methods for measuring and monitoring sustainable agriculture. 98p. Technical Report n. 22. Global Strategy Technical Report, Rome. [Google Scholar]
  • Jradi S., Chameeva T.B., Delhomme B., Jaegler A., 2018. Tracking carbon footprint in French vineyards: a DEA performance assessment. J. Clean. Prod., 192, 43–54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Keichinger O., Thiollet-Scholtus M., 2017. SOECO: indicateurs socio-économiques pour la viticulture et les systèmes de culture innovants. BIO Web Conf., 9, 04012. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Koskela M., Vehmas J., 2012. Defining eco-efficiency: a case study on the finnish forest industry. Bus. Strat. Environ., 21, 546–566. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Laurett R., Paço A, Mainardes E.W., 2021. Antecedents and consequences of sustainable development in agriculture and the moderator role of the barriers: proposal and test of a structural model. J. Rural Stud., 86, 270–281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marta-Costa A., Trigo A., Costa J.M., Fragoso R., 2022. Standards and indicators to assess sustainability: the relevance of metrics and inventories. In: Sustainable viticulture and winemaking practices. 391–414. Costa J.M., Catarino S., Escalona J.M., Comuzzo, P. (eds.), Elsevier Editions. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Masera Ó., Astier M., López-Ridaura S., 2000. Sustentabilidad y manejo de recursos naturales. El marco de evaluación MESMIS. 109 p. GIRA A.C. and Mundi-Prensa, México. [Google Scholar]
  • Massuça J., Marta-Costa A., Lucas M.R., 2023. Social dimension of sustainability: assessment in the agribusiness context. New Medit, 22, 63–80. [Google Scholar]
  • Matias J., Cerveira A., Santos C., Marta-Costa A., 2021. Influência do preço da mão de obra na sustentabilidade das explorações vitícolas durienses: uma aplicação de ABM. Rev. Econ. Sociol. Rural, 59, e238886. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • OIV (International Organisation of Vine and Wine, 2024). State of the world vine and wine sector in 2023. OIV Available at: https://www.oiv.int/sites/default/files/2024-04/OIV_STATE_OF_THE_WORLD_VINE_AND_WINE_SECTOR_IN_2023.pdf (accessed on 17.05.2024). [Google Scholar]
  • Pang J., Chen X., Zhang Z., Li H., 2016. Measuring eco-efficiency of agriculture in China. Sustain., 8, 398. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ramos T.B., 2019. Sustainability assessment: exploring the frontiers and paradigms of indicator approaches. Sustain., 11, 824. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rosano-Peña C., Guarnieri P., Sobreiro V.A., Luiz A., Serrano M., Kimura H., 2014. A measure of sustainability of Brazilian agribusiness using directional distance functions and data envelopment analysis. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol., 21, 210–222. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rosano Peña C., Serrano A.L.M., de Britto P.A.P., Franco V.R., Guarnieri P., Thomé K.M., 2018. Environmental preservation costs and eco-efficiency in Amazonian agriculture: Application of hyperbolic distance functions. J. Clean. Prod., 197, 699–707. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Santiago-Brown I., Metcalfe A., Jerram C., Collins C., 2015. Sustainability assessment in wine-grape growing in the new world: economic, environmental, and social indicators for agricultural businesses. Sustain., 7, 8178–8204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Santos M., Galindro A., Santos C., Marta-Costa A., Martinho V., 2019. Sustainability evolution of North and Alentejo vineyard regions. Rev. Port. Estud. Reg., 50, 49–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Santos M., Rodríguez X.A., Marta-Costa A., 2020. Efficiency analysis of viticulture systems in the Portuguese Douro region. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res., 32, 573–591. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Santos M., Rodríguez X.A., Marta-Costa A., 2021. Productive efficiency of wine grape producers in the North of Portugal. Wine Econ. Policy, 10, 3–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Silva J.V.B., Rosano-Peña C., Martins M.M.V., Tavares R.C., Silva P.H., 2022. Ecoeficiência da produção agropecuária na Amazônia brasileira: fatores determinantes e dependência espacial. Rev. Econ. Sociol. Rural, 60, e250907. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Trigo A., Marta-Costa A., Fragoso R., 2021. Principles of Sustainable Agriculture: defining standardised reference points. Sustain., 13, 4086. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Trigo A., Marta-Costa A., Fragoso R., 2022. Sustainability assessment: a tool to build resilience in the face of future crisis. In: Business under crisis, Vol III: Avenues for innovation, entrepreneurship and sustainability. 47–86. Vrontis D., Thrassou A., Weber Y., Shams R., Tsoukatos E., Efthymiou L. (eds.), Palgrave Macmillan Editions. [Google Scholar]
  • Vásquez J., Aguirre S., Fuquene-Retamoso C.E., Bruno G., Priarone P.C., Settineri L., 2019. A conceptual framework for the eco-efficiency assessment of small-and medium-sized enterprises. J. Clean. Prod., 237, 1176602. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.