Open Access
Issue
Ciência Téc. Vitiv.
Volume 29, Number 2, 2014
Page(s) 60 - 70
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/20142902060
Published online 26 January 2015
  • Allen R., Pereira L., Raes D., Smith M., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper nº 56 300p. [Google Scholar]
  • Choné X., Van Leeuwen C., Dubourdieu D., Pierre J., 2001. Stem water potential is a sensitive indicator of grapevine water status. Ann. Bot., 87, 477–483. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cifre J., Bota J., Escalona J., Medrano H., Flexas J., 2005. Physiological tools for irrigation scheduling in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) an open gate to improve water-use efficiency. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 106, 159–170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • CIREN, 2007. Estudio Agrológico Valle de Copiapó y Valle del Huasco. Publicación 135. 126. [Google Scholar]
  • Cohen M., 1994. Funcionamiento hídrico y producción frutal del nogal en zonas semiáridas: aplicación al manejo del riego. 298 p. Tesis Dr. Ing. Agr. Lleida, Escola Técnica Superior D’Enginyeria Agraria, Universitat de Lleida. [Google Scholar]
  • Deloire A., Carbonneau A., Wang Z., Ojeda H., 2004. Vine and water a short review. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin, 38, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • Ferreira R., Sellés G., Maldonado P., Celedón J., Gil P., 2007. Efecto del clima, de las características de la hoja y de la metodología de medición del potencial hídrico xilemático en palto (Persea americana Mill.). Agr. Tec., 67, 182–188. [Google Scholar]
  • Gálvez R., Callejas R., Reginato G., 2010. Comparación de tres indicadores fisiologicos del estado hídrico en vid de mesa. 27. In: 61º Congreso Agronómico de Chile. 11° Congreso de la sociedad chilena de fruticultura. 56th ISTH Annual Meeting. [Google Scholar]
  • Gálvez R., Callejas R., Reginato G., 2011. Comparación de la cámara de presión tipo Scholander modelo Pump-up respecto a la cámara de presión tradicional en vides de mesa. Idesia, 29, 175–179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Garnier E., Berger A., 1985. Testing water potential in peach trees as an indicator of water stress. J. Hort. Sci., 60, 47–56. [Google Scholar]
  • Grimes D., Williams L., 1990. Irrigation effects on plant water relations and productivity of Thompson seedless grapevine. Crop Sci., 30, 225–260. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Goldhamer D., Fereres E., 2001. Simplified tree water status measurement of stem water potential. Calif. Agr., 55, 32–37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Howell T., Meron M., 2007. Irrigation scheduling. Microirrigation for crop production. Design, Operation, and Management. 2nd nd. edition. 61 – 130. Lamm F., Ayars J., Nakayama F. (eds.). Elsevier, The Netherlands. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson R., Reginato R., Idso B., 1977. Wheat canopy temperature: A practical tool for evaluating water requirements. Water Resour., 13, 651–656. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jones H., 2004. Irrigation scheduling:advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods. J. Exp. Bot., 55, 2427–2436. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kaiser R.M., Cavagnaro J.B., Rios M., 2004. Response of Argentinian and European cultivars of Vitis vinifera L. to water stress: II Water relations. Acta Hortic., 646, 47–54. [Google Scholar]
  • Lovisolo C., Hartung W., Schubert A., 2002. Whole-plant hydraulic conductance and root-to-shoot flow of abscisic acid are independently affected by water stress in grapevines. Funct. Plant Biol., 29, 1349–1356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marsal J., Mata M., Del Campo J., Arbones A., Vallverdú X., Girona J., Olivo N., 2008. Evaluation of partial root-zone drying for potential field use as a deficit irrigation technique in commercial vineyards according to two different pipeline layouts. Irrigation Sci., 26, 347–356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McCutchan H., Shackel K., 1992. Stem water potential as a sensitive indicator of water stress in prune trees. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 117, 607–611. [Google Scholar]
  • Medrano H., Escalona J.M., Cifre J., Bota J., Flexas J., 2003. A ten-year study on the physiology of two Spanish grapevine cultivars under field conditions: effects of water availability from leaf photosynthesis to grape yield and quality. Funct. Plant Biol., 30, 607–619. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mendoza J., 2005. Riego de precisión en Vitis vinifera L. cv. Superior Seedless, monitorizado con sondas de capacitivas FDR. 161 p. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena. [Google Scholar]
  • Murray F., 1967. On the computation of saturation vapor pressure. J. Appl. Meteorol., 6, 203–204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Naor A., 1998. Relations between leaf and stem water potentials and stomatal conductance in three field-grown woody. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech., 73, 431–436. [Google Scholar]
  • Naor A., 2000. Midday stem water potential as a plant water stress indicator for irrigation scheduling in fruit trees. Acta Hortic., 537, 447–454. [Google Scholar]
  • Naor A., 2006. Irrigation scheduling and evaluation of tree water status in deciduous orchard. Hortic. Rev., 32, 111–165. [Google Scholar]
  • Navarrete P., 2006. Efecto de la disponibilidad de agua del suelo en el comportamiento estomático, fotosíntesis y transpiración en vid de mesa variedad Crimson Seedless. 29 p. Memoria Ingeniero Agrónomo, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas, Universidad de Chile. [Google Scholar]
  • Olivo N., Girona J., Marsal J., 2009. Seasonal sensitivity of stem water potential to vapour pressure deficit in grapevine. Irrigation Sci., 27, 175–182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Patakas A., Noitsakis B., Chouzouri A., 2005. Optimization of irrigation water use in grapevines using the relationship between transpiration and plant water status. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 106, 253–259. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pire R., De Pire M., Tortolero E., De Fréitez Y., 1988. El riego de la vid (Vitis vinifera L.) en el tocuyo, estado Lara. II Relaciones hídricas. Agronomía Tropical, 38, 155–171. [Google Scholar]
  • Rosati A., Metcalf S., Buchner R., Fulton A., Lampinen B., 2006. Tree water status and gas exchange in walnut under drought, high temperature and vapour pressure deficit. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech., 81, 415–420. [Google Scholar]
  • Saxton K., Rawls W., 2006. Soil water characteristics estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 70, 1569–1578. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sellés G., Ferreira R., Contreras G., Ahumada R., Valenzuela J., Bravo R., 2003. Manejo de riego por goteo en uva de mesa cv. Thompson Seedless cultivado en suelos de textura fina. Agr. Tec., 63, 180–192. [Google Scholar]
  • Sellés G., Ferreira R., Maldonado P., 2002. Cámara de presión: instrumento para controlar el riego a través de mediciones del estado hídrico de las plantas. Aconex, 76, 18–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Shakel K., 2007. Water relations of woody perennial plant species. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin, 41, 121–129. [Google Scholar]
  • Shakel K., 2011. A Plant-based approach to deficit irrigation in trees and vines. Hortscience, 42, 173–177. [Google Scholar]
  • Sackel K., Ahmadi H., Biasi W., Buchner R., Goldhamer D., Gurusinghe S., Hasey J., Kester D., Krueger B., Lampinen B., McGourty G., Micke W., Mitcham E., Olson B., Pelletrau K., Philips H., Ramos D., Schwankl L., Sibbett S., Snyder R., Southwick S., Stevenson M., Thorpe M., Weinbaum S., Yeager J., 1997. Plant water status as an index of irrigation need in deciduous fruit trees. HortTechnology, 7, 23–29. [Google Scholar]
  • Shakel K., Gurusinghe S., Kester D., Micke W., 1998. Water stress responses of almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill)). Acta Hortic., 470, 309–316. [Google Scholar]
  • Shakel K., Lampinen B., Southwick S., Goldhamer D., Olson W., Sibbett S., Keueger W., Yeager J., 2000. Deficit irrigation in prunes: Maintaining productivity with less water. HortScience, 35, 30–33. [Google Scholar]
  • Schultz H., 2003. Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near-isohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two Weld-grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought. Plant Cell Environ., 26, 1393–1405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Smart R., 1974. Aspects of water relations of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera). Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 25, 84–91. [Google Scholar]
  • Sousa T., Oliveira M., Pereira J., 2006. Physiological indicators of plant water status of irrigated and non-irrigated grapevines grown in a low rainfall area of Portugal. Plant Soil, 282, 127–134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tosso J., Torres J., 1986. Relaciones hidricas de la vid, bajo diferentes niveles de riego, usando goteo, aspersion y surcos. II. Efecto sobre el crecimiento vegetativo y la produccion. Agricultura Tecnica, 46, 283–289. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Zyl J., 1987. Diurnal variation in grapevine water stress as a function of changing soil water status and meteorological conditions. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic., 8, 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  • Williams L., Araujo F., 2002. Correlations among predawn leaf, midday leaf, and midday stem water potential and their correlations with other measures of soil and plant water status in Vitis vinifera. J Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 127, 448–454. [Google Scholar]
  • Williams L., Baeza P., 2007. Relations among ambient temperature and vapor pressure deficit and leaf and stem water potentials of fully irrigated, field-grown grapevines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 58, 173–181. [Google Scholar]
  • Williams L., Trout T., 2005. Relationships among vine-and soilbased measures of water status in a Thompson seedless vineyard in response high-frecuency drip irrigation. Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 56, 357–366. [Google Scholar]
  • Winkler A., 1965. La poda. In: Winkler. Viticultura. 301–361. Compañía Editorial Continental, México D.F. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.