Open Access
Issue
Ciência Téc. Vitiv.
Volume 32, Number 1, 2017
Page(s) 1 - 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/20173201001
Published online 09 August 2017
  • Bely M., Rinaldi A., Dubourdieu D., 2003. Influence of assimilable nitrogen on volatile acidity production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae during high sugar fermentation. J. of Biosci. Bioeng., 96, 507–512. [CrossRef]
  • Câmara J.S., Alves M.A., Marques J.C., 2006. Changes in volatile composition of Madeira wines during their oxidative ageing. Anal. Chim. Acta, 563, 188–197. [CrossRef]
  • Campo E., Saenz-Navajas M.P., Cacho J., Ferreira V., 2012. Consumer rejection threshold of ethyl phenylacetate and phenylacetic acid, compounds responsible for the sweet-like off odour in wines made from sour rotten grapes. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 18, 280–286. [CrossRef]
  • Cliff M.A., Pickering G.J., 2006. Determination of odour detection thresholds for acetic acid and ethyl acetate in ice wine. J. Wine Res., 17, 45–52. [CrossRef]
  • Corison C.A., Ough C.S., Berg H.W., Nelson K.E., 1979. Must acetic acid and ethyl acetate as mold and rot indicators in grapes. Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 30, 130–134.
  • Delfini C., Formica J.V., 2001. Wine microbiology: Science and technology. 339 p. CRC Press, Italy.
  • Drysdale G.S., Fleet G.H., 1988. Acetic acid bacteria in winemaking: A review. Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 39, 143–154.
  • Erasmus D.J., Cliff M., Vuuren H.J., 2004. Impact of yeast strain on the production of acetic acid, glycerol, and the sensory attributes of icewine. Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 55, 371–378.
  • Fugelsang K.C., Edwards C.G., 2007. Wine microbiology: Practical applications and procedures. 91-92 p. Springer, USA.
  • Garde-Cerdán T., Ancín-Azpilicueta C., 2006. Review of quality factors on wine ageing in oak barrels. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 17, 438–447. [CrossRef]
  • Garde-Cerdán T., Goñi D.T., Azpilicueta C.A., 2004. Accumulation of volatile compounds during ageing of two red wines with different composition. J. Food Eng., 65, 349–356. [CrossRef]
  • Goode J., Harrop S., 2011. Authentic wine: Toward natural and sustainable winemaking. 215-216 p. University of California Press, USA.
  • ISO, 2005. ISO standard 5495: Sensory analysis: Methodology- Paired comparison test. International Organization for Standardization, Genève.
  • IVBAM. Vinho Madeira. Instituto do Vinho, do Bordado e do Artesanato da Madeira. February 1, 2017, from http://www.ivbam.gov-madeira.pt/.
  • Jackson R.S., 2008. Wine science: Principles and applications. 357, 600 p. Academic Press, USA.
  • Jacobson J.L., 2006. Introduction to wine laboratory practices and procedures. 167 p. Springer Science & Business Media, USA.
  • Joyeux A., Lafon-Lafourcade S., Ribéreau-Gayon P., 1984. Evolution of acetic acid bacteria during fermentation and storage of wine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 48, 153–156. [PubMed]
  • Lambrechts M.G., Pretorius, I.S., 2000. Yeast and its importance to wine aroma - A review. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic, 21, 97–121.
  • Lima Filho T., Minim V.P., Silva R.C., Della Lucia S.M., Minim L.A., 2015. Methodology for determination of two new sensory thresholds: Compromised acceptance threshold and rejection threshold. Food Res. Int., 76, 561–566. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Nogueira J.M., Nascimento A.M., 1999. Analytical characterization of Madeira wine. J. Agric. Food Chem., 47, 566–575. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • OIV 2015. Compendium of International Methods of Analysis of Wines and Musts. International Organisation of Vine and Wine, France.
  • Pereira V., 2011. Effect of the Estufagem process on the chemical constituents of Madeira wines. PhD Thesis, University of Madeira, Portugal.
  • Pereira V., Albuquerque F., Cacho J., Marques J.C., 2013. Polyphenols, antioxidant potential and color of fortified wines during accelerated ageing: The Madeira wine case study. Molecules, 18, 2997–3017. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Pereira V., Cacho J., Marques J.C., 2014. Volatile profile of Madeira wines submitted to traditional accelerated ageing. Food Chem., 162, 122–134. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Portaria nº302/2011, de 2 de Dezembro, Diário da República, 2011. Ministério da Agricultura, do Mar, do Ambiente e do Ordenamento do Território. Artigo 3º - Vinhos licorosos.
  • Prescott J., Norris L., Kunst M., Kim S., 2005. Estimating a “consumer rejection threshold” for cork taint in white wine. Food Qual. Prefer., 16, 345–349. [CrossRef]
  • Remize F., Andrieu E., Dequin S., 2000. Engineering of the pyruvate dehydrogenase bypass in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of the cytosolic Mg(2+) and mitochondrial K(+) acetaldehyde dehydrogenases Ald6p and Ald4p in acetate formation during alcoholic fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 66, 3151–3159. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Rudnitskaya A., Rocha S.M., Legin A., Pereira V., Marques J.C., 2010. Evaluation of the feasibility of the electronic tongue as a rapid analytical tool for wine age prediction and quantification of the organic acids and phenolic compounds. The case-study of Madeira wine. Anal. Chim. Acta, 662, 82–89. [CrossRef]
  • Saliba A.J., Bullock J., Hardie W.J., 2009. Consumer rejection threshold for 1,8-cineole (eucalyptol) in Australian red wine. Food Qual.and Prefer, 20, 500–504. [CrossRef]
  • Schaechter M., 2009. Encyclopedia of microbiology. 149 p. Academic Press, USA.
  • Teixeira M.I., Romão M.V., Bronze M.R., Vilas Boas, L., 2006. 2,4,6-Trichloroanisole: A consumer panel evaluation. Cienc. Tec. Vitivinic., 21, 53–65.
  • Vilela-Moura A., Schuller D., Falco V., Mendes-Faia A., Côrte-Real M., 2010. Effect of refermentation conditions and microoxygenation on the reduction of volatile acidity by commercial S. cerevisiae strains and their impact on the aromatic profile of wines. Int. J. Food Microbiology, 141, 165–172. [CrossRef]
  • Wildenradt H.L., Singleton V.L., 1974. The production of aldehydes as a result of oxidation of polyphenolic compounds and its relation to wine aging. Am. J. Enol. Vitic, 25, 119–126.
  • Zoecklein B.W., 2012. Production wine analysis. 98-111 pp. Van Nostrand, USA.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.