Open Access
Ciência Téc. Vitiv.
Volume 31, Number 1, 2016
Page(s) 1 - 13
Published online 26 July 2016
  • Agosin M.R., Alvarez R., Bravo-Ortega C., 2012. Determinants of export diversification around the world: 1962–2000. The World Economy, 35(3), 295–315. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Antonakis J., Bendahan S., Jacquart P., Lalive R., 2010 On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086–1120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Balabanis G.I., Katsikea E.S., 2003. Being an entrepreneurial exporter: does it pay? International Business Review, 12:233–252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Baldauf A., Cravens D.W., Wagner U., 2000. Examining determinants of export performance in small open economies. Journal of World Business, 35(1), 61–79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barros C.P., Santos J.C.G., 2007. Comparing the productive efficiency of cooperatives and private enterprises: the Portuguese wine industry as a case study. Journal of Rural Cooperation, 35(2), 109–122. [Google Scholar]
  • Battese G., Corra G., 1977. Estimation of a Production Frontier Model: with application to the pastoral zone of eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 21:169–179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Battese G., Coelli T., 1995. A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20:325–332. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Battese G., Coelli T., 1988. Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 38(3), 387–399. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Behr, A., Tente, S., 2008. Stochastic frontier analysis by means ofmaximum likelihood and the method of moments. Discussion Paper Series 2: Banking and Financial Studies No 19/2008. Deutsche Bundesbank.. [Google Scholar]
  • Brodrechtova Y., 2008. Determinants of export marketing strategies of forest products companies in the context of transition - The case of Slovakia. Forest Policy and Economics, 10, 450–459. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cabral S., 2004. Recent evolution of Portuguese export market shares in the European Union. Economic bulletin, pp. 79–91. [Google Scholar]
  • Cabral S., Esteves P.S., 2006. Portuguese export market shares: an analysis by selected geographical and product markets. Economic Bulletin, pp. 57–74. [Google Scholar]
  • Cardeira R.F.F., 2009 Factores Críticos de Sucesso no Mercado do Vinho em Portugal e a Sustentabilidade do Sector Vitivinícola. Dissertação para obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Engenharia e Gestão Industrial. Instituto Superior Técnico (Lisboa). [Google Scholar]
  • Coelli T., 1995. Estimators and hypothesis tests for a stochastic frontier function: A monte carlo analysis. The Journal of Productivity Analysis, 6, 247–268. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cohen B., 2014. Portugal’s anti-port. THIRSTY EXPLORER. Food & Drink, Portugal. Available from ( [Google Scholar]
  • COM, 2012. Relatório da Comissão ao Parlamento Europeu e ao Conselho: em conformidade com o artigo 184.º, n.º 8, do Regulamento (CE) n.º 1234/2007 sobre a experiência adquirida com a implementação da reforma do setor vitivinícola, de 2008. Comissão Europeia, Bruxelas. [Google Scholar]
  • Cullinane K., Song D.-W., 2006. Estimating the relative efficiency of European container ports: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Research in Transportation Economics, 16(1), 85–115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dean D.L., Mengüç B., Myers C.P., 2000. Revisiting firm characteristics, strategy, and export performance relationship: a survey of the literature and an investigation of New Zealand small manufacturing firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 461–477. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Edwards L., Alves P., 2006. South Africa’s export performance: determinants of export supply. South African Journal of Economics, 74(3), 473–500. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • European Central Bank / Eurosystem, 2013. Exchange rates. Available from [Google Scholar]
  • Fischer C., Gil-Alana L.A., 2009. The nature of the relationship between international tourism and international trade: the case of German imports of Spanish wine. Applied Economics, 41, 1345–1359. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Grosso G., Marventano S., Giorgianni G., Raciti T., Galvano F., Mistretta A., 2014. Mediterranean diet adherence rates in Sicily, southern Italy. Public Health Nutrition, 17(9), 2001–2009. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gwynne R.N., 2006. Export-orientation and enterprise development: a comparison of New Zealand and Chilean wine production. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 97(2), 138–156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • International Organization of Vine and Wine (2013); Portuguese Export Market shares in the specific country’s market. available from [Google Scholar]
  • IVV, 2012. Séries dos valores de exportação de vinho a partir de Portugal; available from [Google Scholar]
  • IVV (Consulted in 2014). A vinha e o vinho em Portugal. Available from [Google Scholar]
  • IVV, (s.d.). Análise de mercados de exportação: EUA – Canadá – Brasil – Angola. Observatório do vinho. Available from ( [Google Scholar]
  • Jongwanich J., 2010. Determinants of export performance in East and Southeast Asia. The World Economy, 33(1), 20–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Karelakis C., Mattas K., Chryssochoidis G., 2008. Greek wine firms: determinants of export performance. Agribusiness, 24(2), 275–297. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kollmeyer C., 2015. Globalization and income inequality: How public sector spending moderates this relationship in affluent countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 56(1), 3–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lu V.N., Quester P.G., Medlin C.J., Scholz B., 2012. Determinants of export success in professional business services: a qualitative study. The Service Industries Journal, 32(10), 1637–1652. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Maietta O.W., Sena V., 2010. Financial constraints and technical efficiency: some empirical evidence for Italian producers’ cooperatives. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 81(1), 21–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Observatório dos Mercados Agrícolas e das Importações Agro-Alimentares (s.d.). Evolução da Balança de Pagamentos do Sector do Vinho entre 2000 e 2008. Available from ( [Google Scholar]
  • Olson J.A., Schmidt P., Waldman D.M., 1980. A monte carlo study of estimators of stochastic frontier production functions. Journal of Econometrics, 13, 67–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Seo H.-J., Lee Y.S., Kim H., 2012. The determinants of export market performance in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development service industries. The Service Industries Journal, 32(8), 1343–1354. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sousa C.M.P., Martínez-López F.J., Coelho F., 2008. The determinants of export performance: A review of the research in the literature between 1998 and 2005. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(4), 343–374. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Trotta A., Massaglia S., Ballotta S., Palma S., Bailet I., Liu C., (2015). Interpretation keys in the process of sensitization and education of the Chinese consumer as to the consumption of wine. In: 38th World Congress of Vine and Wine (Part 1). Edited by: JeanMarie, A. BIO Web of Conferences, Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
  • Viviani J.-L., 2009. Export implicit financial performance: the case of French wine companies. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 12(3), 23–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Wines of Portugal (Consulted in 2014). Regiões vitivinícolas. Available from ( [Google Scholar]
  • World Development Indicators (2012); available from [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.